This section looks at development skills which are very important for paralegal work as they contribute to building and empowering communities. These are:
Most of us deal with some or other negotiation every day of our lives. The paralegal will constantly be involved in negotiating on behalf of clients.
WHAT IS NEGOTIATION?
Negotiation takes place when two or more people or groups who have a conflict come together to agree on how best to resolve this conflict. This might mean that one side must compromise.
Usually it means that both sides compromise so that they can reach a settlement. This is called a ‘win-win’ situation.
HOW DO YOU NEGOTIATE?
The main purpose of being a negotiator is to get the best settlement possible for yourself or for the person or group that you are representing. To do this, a negotiator needs certain skills such as:
EXAMPLE
A union official negotiates with the manager of a farm about the right of employees to join the union. The union official is very emotional because the manager is threatening to dismiss the employees. The union official also believes that the manager is not concerned about the employees and that he is cruel and immoral.
The manager is also very emotional. He believes that the union official is trying to take over the farm. He is worried about financial losses, and believes that as soon as employees join a union they will go on strike. He believes that all employees are lazy and only want money to spend on alcohol.
In this example, there are many conflicting emotions, prejudices, and values between the two sides. This will affect negotiations between the two parties.
PREPARING FOR NEGOTIATIONS
The following points are a guide to planning and preparing for a negotiation.
STEPS IN PLANNING AND PREPARING BEFORE NEGOTIATION | |
IDENTIFY THE ISSUE | Background and context – Analyse the background and context ofto the issue. Each issue has its own particular background and history that is important to know and acknowledge in a negotiation. Power and positions of the parties – Look at the power and positions that the different parties will have in the negotiation you are preparing for. For example, a municipality wants to build a road through a town. To do this it needs to move people living there. The people are not prepared to move until the municipality finds them acceptable alternative land. The municipality has the power of its official position, and it has the power of the law behind it (under the Constitution, property can be expropriated in certain circumstances). The community also has the power of the law (they cannot be arbitrarily evicted from the land or be evicted without a court order). The community also has the power of large numbers. |
DEFINE YOUR OBJECTIVES | Work out your key points and what you want to achieve in the negotiation. |
BE CLEAR ABOUT YOUR MANDATE | As a paralegal, you will be representing either a person or a group in negotiations. You must know what your mandate is from that person or group. In other words, you must know exactly what they want and how much they are prepared to compromise. |
SELECT A TEAM | Select a negotiation team. It is usually better to have more than one person in a negotiating team. |
GET TO KNOW THE OTHER SIDE | You need to have as much information as possible about the people in the party you are negotiating against. For example, you need to know what their interests and needs are in the issue, their strengths, weaknesses, problems and pressures. |
PLAN YOUR PRESENTATION | Organise all the information you have gathered in a logical format so that it can be used in the negotiation. |
STEPS IN THE PROCESS OF NEGOTIATION | |
PARTIES MEET | The parties meet, and they acknowledge a problem exists. Each party states the reason (as they see it) for the negotiation. |
EXPLORING THE ISSUES | The negotiation moves into the issues, and parties say what their needs and interests are. This is the exploration phase, where the parties ask lots of questions and acknowledge the common points. |
BARGAINING PHASE | Parties move into the bargaining phase, where they start to look for possible solutions or options for solving the problem. During this phase, the parties may even start moving closer together and there may be a feeling of working together to solve a common problem. Negotiation does not always mean that parties have to be aggressive towards each other. For a negotiation to end in an agreement, one side must show that it is ready to ‘move’ or compromise. |
REACHING AGREEMENT | The parties reach an agreement. At this point you may need to take the agreement back to the person or group on whose behalf you are negotiating. If the agreement falls within the mandate you were given, then you can make a final agreement. |
REPORT BACK TO THE GROUP | You will always need to report back to the person or group you were representing to tell them what the outcome of the negotiation was. |
PUTTING THE SETTLEMENT INTO PRACTICE | Once you agree to something with the other side, then you must make sure that the agreement is put into practice. |
NEGOTIATING TO GET AN EMPLOYEE’S JOB BACK
You are representing an employee who has been dismissed. You have to negotiate with the manager of the company where she was working.
GETTING A MANDATE
The employee wants her job back and asks you to represent her. You have to stay in touch with this person throughout and get a new mandate if there are changes.
PREPARING AND PLANNING FOR THE NEGOTIATION
MEETING OR CONTACTING THE OTHER SIDE
GOING BACK TO THE PERSON OR GROUP YOU ARE REPRESENTING
You go back to the employee and explain what the manager has offered. (If you think it is a good settlement try to encourage the employee to accept it.) If the employee accepts the offer, you telephone the manager again and say that you agree to the company’s offer.
PUTTING THE SETTLEMENT INTO PRACTICE
Where two conflicting parties cannot reach agreement on the issue causing the conflict, they can agree to ask a third party (a mediator) to help them reach a solution. A mediator is a person who acts as a facilitator between the parties but does not make a decision about who is right or wrong. So, a mediator is not a judge.
The mediator goes on to assist both sides until the parties themselves come to an agreement. If it is clear that the parties are not going to reach an agreement, the mediator might have to withdraw from the process. The parties will then have to find another way to resolve their conflict, for example, by using arbitration or going to court. (See Settling disputes outside of court)
The main job of a mediator is to keep the parties in the negotiation communicating with each other. To do this the mediator must get the trust and confidence of both parties and keep this trust by always being objective. The mediator must try to find out exactly what the problem or conflict is about. When the two sides meet together the mediator must encourage both sides to be realistic about what they want from the other side and what they are prepared to give.
If you are representing a person or group at a mediation you need to prepare for the mediation in the same way as for a negotiation.
CONSUMER COMPLAINTS – You can use mediation or arbitration to solve consumer complaints. For example, a second-hand TV which you bought breaks down completely after a month. The company that you bought it from refuses to fix it. It is too expensive to go to court, so you could ask the company to agree to call in a third party to act as a mediator between you and the company. This is a cheaper and much quicker way of solving the problem.
DISPUTES IN THE COMMUNITY – Community or neighbourhood disputes such as those between different political groups, or landlords and tenants.
THE CRIMINAL COURTS – In some cases mediation could be used to bring the person who committed the crime together with the victim of the crime, to see whether they can reach any agreement as an alternative to laying a criminal charge.
EDUCATION – Disputes between students and teachers, students and administrators, parents and administrators, and so on.
ENVIRONMENT – Disputes between communities and authorities, for example about dams, waste disposal, land development and so on.
FAMILY OR DIVORCE MATTERS – Family and divorce disputes.
You should be flexible when you plan a mediation session. For example, a more informal mediation between two neighbours needs a different approach compared to a mediation between a consumer and a company. On the next page is an example of a mediation session. This example is for a formal mediation session around a conflict between two organisations, parties or groups. You need to allow time for translation, for each side to caucus (speak among themselves), or to give the mediator time to meet both sides separately. (See Checklist: Mediation code of conduct; See Checklist: Tips for mediators)
OUTLINE FOR A MEDIATION SESSION |
INTRODUCTION (5 mins)Explain the structure and aims of the mediation session |
OPENING OF MEDIATION (15 mins)Welcome IntroductionsAgreeing to rules and procedures (no interruptions, no aggression, time-out if needed, etc.) |
STATEMENT OF POSITIONS (30 mins)Each side presents their position (their point of view)The mediator summarises these positionsAllow time for clarifying questionsAllow responses |
FINDING COMMON GROUND (POINTS THAT BOTH SIDES AGREE ON) (30 mins)What is each side prepared to do – ask for practical suggestions and possible solutionsTake responses to these suggestionsThe mediator summarises the common ground and adds an alternative solution. Note: if there is very little common ground at this point, this might be a good time for the mediator to speak to both sides separately and in private |
REASSESSING AGREEMENT (10 MINS)Give both sides a chance to caucus on how they feel about suggested solutions |
REACHING AGREEMENT (30 MINS)Ask each side to briefly repeat their position and say what they feel about the possible solutionsThe mediator goes over the common ground and summarises any points of agreementEncourage agreement on the remaining pointsWrite down and read back whatever agreement is reached |
CLOSURE OF MEDIATION (15 MINS)Discuss the way forward, including the enforcement, monitoring and publicising of the agreement, and the need for future meetingsThank everyone |
ARBITRATION
In an arbitration, a third party, acceptable to both parties, is called in to help the parties resolve the conflict. The difference between an arbitration and a mediation is that in an arbitration, the arbitrator is called on to decide who is right or wrong. In other words, the arbitrator acts like a judge. The arbitrator chairs the hearing at which both parties are present, listens carefully to both sides of the story, listens to any witness, and looks at any documents that might be produced as evidence. They then go through all the evidence and decide who wins the arbitration. The arbitrator writes down the reasons for their decision in a judgment and gives this to the parties.
Before the arbitration takes place the parties should agree in writing on the parameters of the arbitrator’s powers. For example, will the arbitrator’s decision be final or will there be a right of appeal. Usually the parties agree that the decision of the arbitrator is final. This means the parties must obey this decision and the losing party cannot appeal against the decision. An arbitrator should use proper legal principles to interpret the evidence, but the arbitration process is not as formal as in a court. (See Arbitration by the CCMA or Bargaining Council)
Community education usually takes place in interactive workshops where the person running the workshop acts as a facilitator rather than a trainer.
BASIC GUIDELINES FOR RUNNING A WORKSHOP
PLANNING A WORKSHOP
You can plan and structure a workshop according to the following guidelines:
WORKSHOP METHODS
These are some examples of workshop methods.
Introductions
Big group (plenary) methods
Small group methods
Small group discussions are an important part of all workshops. After any long presentation (for example an input, role-play or drama), break people up into small groups to discuss what they saw or heard. Small groups should have no more than 8 people. Give small groups at least 30 minutes for discussion. It is better to give groups one or two clear questions to discuss rather than a long list of questions.
Facilitating small groups – A facilitator is a ‘group leader’. Each group should have a facilitator who has been part of the workshop planning and who is clear on the questions the group has to discuss. Ask someone else in the group to take notes and to report back in the big group later on. The facilitator makes sure that everyone gets a chance to speak, that people stick to the topic and that people do not interrupt each other or get involved in one-to-one discussions. (See Guidelines for facilitating small groups)
Floating – While people are discussing in small groups, it is a good idea to have one or more of the workshop organisers moving about from group to group checking if everyone is clear on the questions, and, later on, reminding people how much time they have left.
Reporting-back – There must always be a full report-back from each of the small groups. Ask the report-back person to report back in a lively way. The main points only should be summarised. Write on newsprint the main points that each group reports. You can also ask each group to write a very short summary of their discussion on newsprint. Put this up for everyone to see.
These are methods you can use to improve small group discussions:
GUIDELINES FOR FACILITATING SMALL GROUPS
LANGUAGE
The two main problems concerning language in a community workshop situation are what language to use and the level of the language.
Choice of language – Part of your planning for the workshop, should include the language you are going to use and whether you need translation. Translation could be in full, in other words, point by point, or it could be a summary after a whole section.
Level of language – The success or failure of a community workshop can rest on the level of language used. When planning the workshop it is important to identify your workshop audience and what level of language you should aim for. These are some basic guidelines:
Written materials should be easy for the audience to read and understand. These are some of the ways to make written materials easier to read:
WORKSHOP RESOURCES
These are examples of workshop resources which can be used during workshops or after workshops for people to take away and read:
EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT
Evaluation is a process where a facilitator gets feedback from participants about how they experienced the workshop. Assessment is a process for measuring what participants have learnt and whether they have achieved their objectives (for the workshop).
EVALUATION
Evaluation is about judging the overall value or worth of your workshop. By using various evaluation tools you can get information from participants that will tell you how they experienced the workshop, what contributed to the learning process and what hindered it. This information will help you decide whether the workshop was successful, whether it achieved what you wanted it to, and what the problems were. In this way you can build on your strengths and learn from your mistakes. So, workshop evaluations can be used for different purposes, such as:
Finding out whether workshop aims have been achieved (from the participant’s perspective) Finding out how things can be improved during the workshop or for future workshops Showing participants that their views are valued Giving feedback to donors or other interested parties
What are you evaluating?
Your evaluation will provide you with information about one or more of the following aspects:
When do you evaluate?
As a rule, you should always include some form of evaluation in your workshop plan, either as an ongoing evaluation throughout the workshop, or at the end of the workshop.
The most common form of evaluation is probably the questionnaire handed out at the end of a workshop for participants to complete and hand in. However, evaluation can be included at different stages of a workshop. For example, a ‘Mood evaluation’ can be done at the same time each day to evaluate participants’ moods. This can help you pick up any negative feelings about the workshop early on, and you can try to deal with the issues that are creating the negative feelings.
ASSESSMENT
While evaluation looks at the overall value and worth of the workshop, assessment has to do with measuring what participants have learnt at the workshop. Assessment measures what participants have learnt against set standards. ‘Set standards’ in a workshop programme are the learning objectives defined at the beginning of the programme. The learning objectives should say clearly what the participants should be able to do at the end of the workshop and the assessment helps to see whether they have actually achieved this.
EXAMPLE
In a workshop on child abuse and human rights protection mechanisms, the learning objectives are for participants at the end of the workshop to be able to:
So, by the end of the workshop, participants should be able to do what is described in the objectives. They could write a test or complete an assignment to determine whether or not these learning objectives have been achieved.
What do you assess?
To see whether participants have achieved the objectives, you will measure one or more of the following:
EXAMPLES
Your assessment of the learning in these workshops could be to set a test where participants have to draw up a budget for a specific case-study set or do an assignment where they draw up a budget for a specific project.
2. At the end of a workshop on the rights of refugees, participants should be able to:
Your assessment of learning in this workshop could include a test where participants have to list the rights that apply to refugees, explain how they would apply these rights in their own casework and define positive steps that can be taken to stop discrimination against refugees in their own community.
When do you assess?
You do not always have to include assessment in your training workshop. It all depends on the nature and the purpose of the workshop.
NOTE: You need to be cautious if you do decide to include assessment in your workshop. Adults are not used to being assessed and may feel threatened.
So, if you are planning to do an assessment you should discuss this with the participants at the beginning of the workshop – they need to understand why it is necessary and how it can help them.
You can find the addresses and telephone numbers for organisations that provide training and support for paralegals on under Resources.